by Pa Rock
Missouri Voter
This morning I hauled myself into town and voted "absentee" in our state's August primary election. I always vote early and absentee because I do not like dealing with the political rodents who scurry about the parking lots at the polling places on election day trying to promote candidates and issues to people who are in a rush to cast their ballots and get to work on time. Also, if one of my meth-addled neighbors happens to drive down the lane shooting rabbits from his (or her) car window and accidentally sprays me with automatic weapon fire, I can expire with a smile on my face knowing that I have already voted!
Missouri doesn't register by political party, so a voter chooses a party ballot when they present to vote. I don't subscribe to the local newspaper and therefore asked to see sample ballots at the county clerk's office so I could make a decision as to which one to request. A very nice office worker led me to a glass wall where several ballots were posted, with the ones I was most interested in being about a foot above my head. I could barely tilt my head back far enough to even see the ballots, much less read them. As I looked about for a chair to stand on, my helper rushed to a file cabinet and brought me four copies that I could sort through, study, and select from: Democratic, Republican, Libertarian, and Independent.
South Missouri is basically a theocracy where 80 percent of voters are Republican, as God intended. The GOP ballot that I inspected had candidates listed for every office, and two or more running for most offices. I wasn't familiar with any name on that ballot, a fact that I think speaks better of me than it does of them, and I therefore didn't have a horse in that race.
The Democratic ballot had two candidates for state auditor, two for Representative in Congress, and no candidates for any county office. There was one candidate running unopposed for state representative - and two ladies vying for a single spot on the local Democratic County Committee. I also did not know any of the Democratic candidates, but chose that ballot basically to show support for the party.
The big action was on four proposed amendments to the Missouri Constitution. All four were proposed by our malicious state legislature whose primary function is to find more ways of directing state revenue away from public schools and into private and religious daycares and activity centers posing as schools. Our legislature also claims a rigorous "pro-life" mantle by passing everything it can think of to limit women's rights to make their own healthcare decisions - and to make it easier and for anyone to carry loaded firearms wherever they damned well please. A good rule of thumb is that if the amendment originates in the legislature, it is probably rooted in bad intent and sometimes pure evil.
The two most controversial amendments on the ballot were amendments 4 and 5. Lots of money has been spent trying to convince voters to cast ballots for and against each of those issues.
Amendment 4 deals with how the people of the state may amend OUR constitution. Traditionally Missourians have been able to amend the state constitution through an initiative and referendum process involving the signing of petitions followed by a statewide vote on the matter with a simple majority prevailing. The state legislature has problems with this system because the people of the state are far less backward than their elected representatives in Jefferson City. We are supposed to want what they say we should want.
In recent years Missourians have used their own initiative to propose and then pass amendments to OUR constitution to legalize a woman's right the choose her own medical care - including abortion care, and to legalize the recreational use of marijuana - both firmly opposed by the state legislature. To solve the problem of voters proposing and getting the types of services and rights they actually want, the state legislature came up with a plan that thwarts democracy. If Amendment 4 passes, a statewide majority on a constitutional amendment vote would no longer suffice. Approval of the amendment would require passing it in EACH of the state's eight congressional districts. That is something that would NEVER happen, so basically citizens would lose their right to amend the state constitution.
Amendment 5 has to do with elimination property tax and replacing it with increased sales tax. Sales tax is regressive - it is more of a burden on those who are less able to afford it. The middle class and poor spend a larger portion of their income on necessities and will thus pay more taxes - and many of them would see no benefit at all from the elimination of property taxes. And people already living comfortably would receive a nice windfall.
I am proud to have voted "NO" on Amendments 4 and 5.

