Showing posts with label Karl Rove. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Karl Rove. Show all posts

Saturday, April 4, 2009

The Killing Rage

by Pa Rock
Social Commentator

Two weeks ago four policemen were murdered by an unemployed parolee in Oakland, California. Yesterday thirteen people were shot and killed by a fellow who had just lost his job in Binghamton, New York. And today in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, three policemen were gunned down and two others seriously wounded by a paranoid young man who believed President Obama was going to take his guns away.

It would be a cheap shot to note all of that violent death and surmise that America is going nuts. The sad truth is, that when it comes to our guns, this country has been nuts for a very long time.

The National Rifle Association, a tool of gun manufacturers, and its mouthpiece, Wayne LaPierre, have been stirring the rabble for years with tales of jackbooted police officers and liberal politicians kicking in the doors of honest citizens and trying to take away their guns. They intentionally keep the paranoia raging because that sells guns. Any sensible legislation that tries to place some controls on who can own what types of guns is shouted down as being un-American. And not only have gun manufactures and distributors blanketed America with their deadly insanity, they have now targeted Mexico and are complicit in arming the drug cartels.

This morning Roland Poplawski, a twenty-three-year-old young man in Pittsburgh, PA, opened fire on several policemen with his AK 47 assault rifle. Wayne LaPierre, or Glenn Beck, or Bill O'Reilly, or Sean Hannity, or Karl Rove, or Ann Coulter, or some other great talker had convinced him that President Obama was going to take his guns away. What a shame that somebody hadn't taken them away - three families wouldn't be grieving tonight if that had happened.

Roland, did you really need those guns in your quiet neighborhood? President Obama wasn't going to get your guns. Those people lied to you. But the state of Pennsylvania did get your guns, and now you will never get them back. You didn't need them where you were living, but you will sorely regret not having them where you are going.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Judicial Ethics for Dummies

by Pa Rock
Court Reporter

"An honest politician is one who, when he is bought, will stay bought."--Simon Cameron

Today the United States Supreme Court heard the case of Caperton v. Massey, a case so simple in its logic that my nine-year-old grandson could hear it after breakfast and make a sensible decision before the early recess. But the Supreme Court, being the Supreme Court, is apparently closely divided - 5 to 4 one way or the other - on what would be a slam dunk in any traffic court.

A decade or so ago Harman Mining, a modest West Virginia coal mining operation, had a lucrative contract with a large steel manufacturing company in Pittsburg, PA. Things were going fine, according to Hugh Caperton, the owner of Harman Mining, until his contract was hijacked by the nation's fourth largest coal mining company, Massey Energy. Harman Mining took Massey Energy to Court and won an astounding judgement of $50 million. The decision was promptly appealed to the district level where it was upheld.

Massey Energy then appealed to the Supreme Court of West Virginia. A major Massey stockholder who regards himself as a warrior for the business class, did not want to see his company risk competing in an impartial judicial setting, and decided to stack the deck. The stockholder, who had been paid millions by Massey over the years, targeted one particular Justice whom he believed would be unfavorable toward Massey. He put up a puppet candidate and smeared the sitting Justice with attacks so vile they would have shamed Karl Rove. One rumor generated by the smear machine was that the Justice had helped to turn a pedophile loose in the public schools. The stockholder spent over $3 million and was able to get his man elected. Not surprisingly, the new Justice cast the deciding vote not once, but twice, to throw out that $50 million verdict. The stockholder's money had been well spent indeed!

That same stockholder, described in news articles as "a large man with small eyes that betray nothing," was later spotted with another West Virginia Supreme Court Justice in Monte Carlo. When ABC News asked him about that gambling junket, he shoved a cameraman and suggested that someone was "liable to get shot" if reporters didn't mind their own beeswax. (Gotta love those good ole boys!)

The stockholder who spent three million dollars in a West Virginia judicial decision had this to say about the allegations that he had bought a judge:

"I've been around West Virginia long enough to know that politicians don't stay bought, particularly ones that are going to be in office for 12 years. So I would never go out and spend money to try to gain favor with a politician. Eliminating a bad politician makes sense. Electing somebody hoping he's going to be in your favor doesn't make any sense at all."

Malarkey! The stockholder's judge stayed bought. That is one ethical rascal!

But drama aside, thirty-nine states elect the judges to their Supreme Courts, and judges at some level are elected in nearly every jurisdiction in America. The question before the U.s. Supreme Court is real and it is vital. Can justice be bought? Unfortunately, at least the four most conservative justices seem to see no problem with judges accepting huge political contributions and then helping to decide cases that involve their sugar daddies.

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Dear Liddy

by Pa Rock
Citizen Journalist


I sent the following email to the office of North Carolina's senior US Senator, Elizabeth Dole, earlier today. I am not expecting a response, but I do feel better for having communicated my concern regarding her Rovian campaign for re-election.

Senator Dole,

As a resident of Arizona and the Missouri Ozarks, I would normally have no interest in North Carolina politics. However, after listening to the disgusting "godless" commercial that your re-election campaign put out, I suddenly feel the need to help the good people of North Carolina eject you from the Senate. I am today sending a donation to help Kay Hagan win that crucial election.

Senator, your commercial suggesting that Methodist Sunday School teacher Hagan is a godless atheist, was the most vile election advertisement that I have witnessed in fifty years of tracking politics. You should be very ashamed! In fact, I am ashamed for you!

America is better than that.

Rocky Macy
Goodyear, AZ


Liddy Dole will be defeated in North Carolina because this is not a good year for "low road" politics. The Senate and the country will both be better off without her!