by Pa Rock
Skeptic
Skeptic
My Aunt Mary, an elderly lady who remains as sharp as a
proverbial tack, recommended a book to me a few months back, and I have finally
gotten around to reading it. Aunt Mary,
who is somewhere in her mid-to-late eighties, is of an age when the subject of
mortality begins to be more and more at the forefront of a person’s thoughts.
(In fact, those same thoughts also are beginning to eat up
vast amounts of my time as well. When
the dogs bark outside late at night, one of my first assumptions is that it is
the Grim Reaper peeking in my windows and checking his watch.)
Mankind has spent millennia stumbling around in pursuit of
the promise of an afterlife, often padding the pockets of ministers, psychics, and other charlatans in the process. Death comes
to all, but can’t there be something beyond so that one does not actually cease
to exist at the point where our physical bodies give out? That would be such a comfort.
The book that Aunt Mary recommended was Proof of Heaven by Eben Alexander, MD. Dr. Alexander, a neurosurgeon, went into a
six-day coma in 2008 due the sudden and unexplained emergence of bacterial
meningitis. He had, through his vocation,
come into contact with people who had suffered “near death experiences” (NDEs)
in the past, something that he and his colleagues had discounted as a burst of
last-minute brain activity as the patient lay presumably dying. Dr. Alexander’s opinion of these near death
experiences changed dramatically after he had one of his own in 2008.
While Dr. Alexander is quick to point out that no two near
death experiences are exactly the same, they often contain several of the same
elements: the person’s consciousness rising
out of the body and observing the scene from an elevated position, being drawn
toward a bright light, and the appearance of an afterlife guide in the form of a deceased
loved one. Usually the person in the
process of almost passing retains a knowledge of who they are in life.
Dr. Alexander’s view into the afterlife was a tri-parte
affair with the initial stage being a place of darkness that sounded like a view of his body from
inside of itself. He called this the
Earthworm’s Eye View and soon became uncomfortable with it. Beyond that a segmented bright light led him
into an aerial view above a bucolic scene inhabited by people in peasant
garb. And beyond that was the Core, a
place of comfort where he was able to communicate directly and completely with
God through every aspect of his being.
The patient, Dr. Alexander, did not retain a knowledge of
who or what he was during the six-days that he remained in the coma. He did encounter a guide, a young woman
sitting on a butterfly wing who imparted the sense that everything was going to
be alright.
Dr. Alexander, who obviously had the very best of medical
care, awoke after six days, something which surprised his physicians, doctors
who had been preparing the family for his removal from life support. His malady was a direct attack on the brain,
so his physicians were further nonplussed when it became apparent that he was
slowly regaining mastery of his medical knowledge and training.
It was an amazing medical case with an apparent miracle
cure, and the patient emerged from the coma a changed man. He came out of it with a belief in the
existence of God and an afterlife.
Whereas the good doctor had routinely ignored or discounted
the near death experiences of others, he now was a believer – primarily for two
reasons: first, his experiences in the
great beyond were so vivid and realistic, and second, the guide on the
butterfly wing turned out to closely resemble a deceased natural sister whom the doctor,
adopted into another family as an infant, had never seen.
And those are the points at which I feel the need to part
company with Dr. Alexander. It sounds a
bit egotistical and self-serving for something to be real only after it happens
to you personally. And when he first
saw a picture of his sister (post coma), he did not immediately recognize her
as being his afterlife guide. I see nothing in his account that preempts the
notion of a sudden burst of brain activity (and his brain was definitely under
attack and fighting back) bringing on his visions of a next world. And while Dr. Alexander may have never seen
his birth sister or her picture prior to the medical incident, he had met his
birth mother and another sister, both of whom could have had some impact –
through appearance or mannerisms – on his vision of the ethereal guide.
Like Fox Mulder, I want to believe – and it pains me that
Dr. Alexander’s book failed to take me to the plain of self-satisfaction where
my Aunt Mary resides. Maybe, if I make
it into my eighties, I will reread it and be convinced, but for the time being I must remain skeptical.
More on this subject may be found at: www.eternea.org
1 comment:
Skeptics are welcome. If it were science I could plot an empirical path to and from the City of God. It isn't science, its faith.
The recurring theme of Scripture, to me, is that no matter how much humans strive to be "holy" or "righteous" they always fail. And the only thing God seems to be immutable about is constantly being available to us.
In the final analysis the atheists and doubters may be correct. If that is the case I think the world is a little better off for folk like me tempering themselves with good intentions, a dose of humility, and having made the world a little better off.
If that is not the case, then I think the world is a little better off for folk like me tempering themselves with good intentions, a dose of humility, and having made the world a little better off.
I am not concerned about discovering scientific certainty in matters of faith. Now is the only time we have.
Post a Comment